2 million BP |
Lower Palaeolithic |
80,000 |
Middle Palaeolithic |
35000 |
Upper Palaeolithic |
12000 |
Mesolithic |
10000 |
Neolithic |
6000 |
Chalcolithic |
2600 BCE |
Harappan civilisation |
1000 BCE |
Use of iron |
600BCE-400 CE |
Early historic |
Introduction
-
Indus valley/Harappan Civilisation was a Bronze Age civilisation (3300-1300 BCE) in the north western regions of South Asia(India, Pakistan, Afghanistan)
-
The Indus Valley Civilisation is also named the Harappan civilisation after Harappa
-
Harappa was the first site to be excavated in the 1921
-
Harappan civilization flourished in the basins of the Indus River.
• Harappan period witnessed the First urbanisation in India.
V.K.Vinod
Sources
• Archaeological evidences (remains of houses, pots, ornaments, tools and seals)
The Harappan seal
➢ The Harappan seal is the most distinctive artefact of the Harappan civilisation.
➢ Made of a stone called steatite, seals often contain animal motifs and signs from a script
Harappan period
Before 2600 BCE
|
Early Harappa culture
|
2600BCE to 1900 BCE
|
Mature Harappa culture
|
After 1900 BCE
|
Late Harappa culture
|
Extent/ Boundary of Harappan culture
V.K.Vinod
1 |
North |
Manda |
Jammu Kashmir India |
2 |
South |
Daimabad |
Maharashtra India |
3 |
East |
Alamgirpur |
Utharpradesh India |
4 |
West |
Sutkagendor |
Baluchistan Province Pakistan |
Important Mature Harappan sites and
their Location
1 |
Harappa |
Punjab Province, Pakistan(on an old bank of the River Ravi) |
2 |
Mohenjodaro |
Larkana District of Sindh Pakistan (on bank of Indus River) |
V.K.Vinod
3 |
Kalibangan |
Rajasthan India |
4 |
Dholovira |
Gujarat India |
5 |
Lothal |
Gujarat India |
6 |
Suktagendor |
Baluchistan Province Pakistan |
7 |
Kotdiji |
Sindh, Pakistan. |
8 |
Banawali |
Haryana India |
9 |
Chanhudaro |
Sindh, Pakistan. |
10 |
Nageshwar |
Gujarath India |
11 |
Rangpur |
Gujarath India |
12 |
Manda |
Jammu Kashmir India |
13 |
Rakhigarhi |
Haryana India |
14 |
Amri |
Sindh, Pakistan. |
15 |
Balakot |
Khyber, Pakistan |
16 |
Mitathal |
Haryana India |
17 |
Ganweriwala |
Punjab Pakistan |
18 |
Cholistan |
Punjab Pakistan |
19 |
Shortugai |
Afghanistan |
The term CULTURE
-
Archaeologists use the term “culture” for a group of objects, distinctive in style, that are usually found together within a specific geographical area and period of time.
-
In the case of the Harappan culture, these distinctive objects include seals, beads, weights, stone blades and even baked bricks.
• These objects were found from areas as far apart as Afghanistan, Jammu, Baluchistan (Pakistan) and Gujarat
V.K.Vinod
Early Harappan Culture Features
✔ Originated in the period before 2600 BCE
✔ Distinctive pottery
✔ Agriculture
✔ Pastoralism
✔ Some crafts.
✔ Small settlements
✔ No large buildings.
✔ No cities
Mature Harappan Culture features
|
✔ Developed in the period between 2600-1900BCE
✔ Urban culture/city life ✔ belongs to bronze period |
V.K.Vinod
✔ Administration
✔ Town Planning
✔ The citadel
✔ The warehouse
✔ The Great bath
✔ Drainage system
✔ Arts and Crafts
✔ Seals
✔ Script ✔ Trade
V.K.Vinod
Archaeo-botanists |
specialists in ancient plant
remains
|
Archaeo-zoologists (zoo- archaeologists) |
specialists in ancient animal
remains
|
Mature Harappan culture
Sites and importance
1 |
Harappa |
Citadel, granary |
2 |
Mohenjodaro |
Warehouse, great bath, priest king, dancing girl |
3 |
Cholistan, Banawali |
Terracotta models of the plough
|
4 |
Kalibangan |
a ploughed field, fire altars |
5 |
Shortugai |
Traces of canals
|
6 |
Dholavira |
Water reservoirs
|
7 |
Chanhudaro |
craft production(bead-making, |
V.K.Vinod
shell-cutting, metal-working, seal-making and weight-making.) |
||
8 |
Nageshwar |
Shell making |
9 |
Balakot |
Shell making |
10 |
Lothal |
Dockyard, port city |
Harappa
-
✔ Harappa was destroyed by brick robbers.
-
✔ Alexander Cunningham noted that the amount of brick taken from the ancient site was enough to lay bricks for “about 100 miles” of the railway line between Lahore and Multan.
Mohenjodaro
✔ means 'mound of dead'
Subsistence Strategies of Harappan people1.Agriculture : Wheat, barley, lentil, chickpea and sesame, Millets:(Gujarat)
rice(Lothal, Rangpur)
2.Domestication of animals : cattle, sheep, goat, buffalo
3.Hunting or scavenging : boar, deer and gharial
4.Fishing
5.Fowl
Food habits of Harappan people
-
➔ Ate plant and animal products, including fish.
-
➔ Archaeologists found evidences from charred grains and seeds.
-
➔ Bones of Wild species found
-
➔ Bones of fish and fowl are found.
Agricultural technologies of Harappa
• Oxen were used for ploughing (Representations on seals and terracotta sculpture)
V.K.Vinod
-
Terracotta models of the plough have been found at sites in Cholistan(Pakistan) and at Banawali (Haryana).
-
Evidence of a ploughed field at Kalibangan (Rajasthan)
-
Ploughed field at Kalibangan had two sets of furrows suggesting that two different crops were grown
-
Traces of canals have been found at Shortughai in Afghanistan
-
Water reservoirs found in Dholavira (Gujarat)
Food processing technologies of Harappa
-
Processing of food required grinding equipment as well as vessels for mixing, blending and cooking.
-
These were made of stone, metal and terracotta.
-
Saddle quern used for grinding cereals.
V.K.Vinod
V.K.Vinod
Mohenjodaro A Planned Urban Centre
Division of cities
• Cities were divided in to two parts: 1.The Citadel
2.The Lower Town
Citadel
-
A citadel or upper town is the core fortified area of a town or city.
-
It was built on the raised platform
-
It situated in the Western part of city
-
Consisted of large structures which functioned as administrative buildings
-
massive buildings, for example warehouse, great bath, granaries.
-
Small in size as compared to the lower town
-
Citadel was walled in most of the cities
-
At sites such as Dholavira and Lothal the entire settlement was fortified
Lower town
-
It was located on the lower part of the town
-
It situated in the eastern part of city
-
This part of the town was much larger than the citadel.
-
This part of the town had the residential housing.
-
Main activities of the people for example trade, craftmaking etc were done here
-
Lower city also walled
The warehouse(the great granary)
-
➢ Found in Mohenjodaro
-
➢ a massive structure found in the citadel
-
➢ lower part made by brick remain
-
➢ upper portions made of wood, decayed long ago
-
➢ used to preserve grains
V.K.Vinod
The Great Bath
-
➢ The "great bath" is the earliest public water tank in the ancient world
-
➢ It was found in Mohenjodaro
-
➢ It was a large rectangular tank in a courtyard
-
➢ Surrounded by a corridor on all four sides.
-
➢ Two flights of steps (north and south)
-
➢ Tank was made watertight by setting bricks on edge and using a mortar of gypsum.
-
➢ There were rooms on three sides
-
➢ Large well in one room(water source)
-
➢ Water from the tank flowed into a huge drain.
-
➢ Across a lane to the north lay a smaller building with eight bathrooms
-
➢ Drains from each bathroom connecting to a drain that ran along the corridor.
➢ Scholars suggest that Great bath was meant for some kind of a
V.K.Vinod
special ritual bath
V.K.Vinod
Drainage system
-
Harappan cities had the well planned drainage system.
-
Roads and streets were laid out along an approximate “grid”
pattern, intersecting at right angles.
-
Streets with drains were laid out first and then houses built along them.
-
The drains were made of mortar, lime and gypsum.
-
ERNEST MACKAY noted: “It is the most complete ancient system
as yet discovered”
-
Every house was connected to the street drains.
-
The main channels were made of bricks set in mortar
-
Channels were covered with loose bricks that could be removed for cleaning.
-
In some cases, limestone was used for the covers.
-
House drains first emptied into a sump or cesspit into which solid matter settled
Drainage channels had sumps for cleaning.
At Lothal while houses were built of mud bricks, drains were
made of burnt bricks.
Domestic architecture/residential buildings in Mohenjodaro
-
● Houses had a courtyard, with rooms on all sides.
-
● Cooking and weaving done in courtyard
-
● No windows in the walls along the ground level(privacy concerned).
-
● The main entrance does not give a direct view of the interior or the courtyard.(privacy concerned).
-
● Every house had its own bathroom paved with bricks
-
● Bathroom connected with drains and through the wall it to the
street drains.
-
● Some houses have remains of staircases to reach a second storey or the roof.
-
● Many houses had wells,often in a room
-
● Wells could be used by passers-by.
-
● The total number of estimated wells in Mohenjodaro was about
V.K.Vinod
700.
How Archaeologists track Social Differences?
1) By Studying burials
2) By Studying artefact(utilitarian and luxuries)
3) By Studying types of houses
Burials
-
The dead were generally laid in pits.
-
Differences in the burials show social differences
-
In Some graves the hollowed-out spaces were lined with bricks.
-
Some graves contain pottery and ornaments
-
Jewellery has been found in burials of both men and women.
-
An ornament of three shell rings, a jasper bead and hundreds of micro beads was found near the skull of a male in Harappa
-
In some instances the dead were buried with copper mirrors. Artefacts
V.K.Vinod
Artefacts are broadly classified as utilitarian and luxuries. The utilitarian
Luxuries
➔includes objects of daily use
➔made easily out of ordinary materials such as stone
or clay.
➔eg: quern, pottery, needles, flesh-rubbers (body scrubbers), etc.
➔rare objects
➔made from costly, non-local materials or with complicated technologies. e.g.: little pots of faïence, Gold
➔valuable materials concentrated in large settlements like Mohenjodaro and Harappa
V.K.Vinod
• Hoards are objects kept carefully by people, often inside containers such as pots.
• Such hoards can be of jewellery or coins or metal objects saved for reuse by metalworkers.
Hoards
V.K.Vinod
• If for some reason the original owners do not retrieve them, they remain where they are left till some archaeologist finds them
• All the gold jewellery found at Harappan sites was recovered from hoards
Craft Production
-
Chanhudaro almost exclusively devoted to craft production
-
Craft production includs bead-making, shell-cutting, metal-
working, seal-making and weight-making.
-
materials used to make beads
-
✔ stones like carnelian (of a beautiful red colour),
jasper, crystal, quartz and steatite;
-
✔ metals like copper, bronze and gold;
-
✔ shell, faïence and terracotta or burnt clay.
-
✔ Some beads were made of two or more stones, cemented together
-
✔ some of stone with gold caps.
-
-
The shapes of beads
✔ disc- shaped, cylindrical, spherical, barrel-shaped,
segmented.
-
✔ Some were decorated by incising or painting
-
✔ some had designs etched onto them.
• Techniques for making beads
-
✔ Some beads were moulded out of a paste made with
steatite powder.
-
✔ the red colour of carnelian was obtained by firing the yellowish raw material and beads at various stages of production.
-
✔ Nodules were chipped into rough shapes, and then finely flaked into the final form.
-
✔ Grinding, polishing and drilling completed the process.
-
✔ Specialised drills found at Chanhudaro, Lothal and at Dholavira.
• Nageshwar and Balakot are specialised centres for making shell objects including bangles
How to identify centres of craft production
V.K.Vinod
• Presence of raw material such as stone nodules, whole shells, copper ore; tools
• Presence of unfinished objects
• Presence of rejects and waste material.
Strategies for Procuring Materials
➔by establishing settlements where raw material available(Nageswar, Balakot for shell)
➔by sending expeditions to areas such as the Khetri region of Rajasthan (for copper) and south India (for gold).
➔By establishing trade relations with other civilisations(Mesopotamia)
Materials and Location
V.K.Vinod
Shell objects |
Nageshwar and Balakot |
|
lapis lazuli |
Shortugai Afghanistan |
|
Carnelian |
Lothal |
procured from Bharuch Gujarat |
Steatite |
Lothal |
procured from South Rajasthan and north Gujarat |
Metal |
Lothal |
procured from Rajasthan |
V.K.Vinod
Copper |
Khetri region of Rajasthan |
|
Gold |
South India |
Transport
• Bullock carts (evidence-terracotta models)
• Ships and boats (depictions of ships and boats in seals)
• Riverine and coastal routes used
Ganeshwar-Jodhpura culture
-
Ganeshwar Jodhpura Culture developed Khetri area of Rajasthan
-
They had Distinctive pottery(Non harappan)
-
They had unusual wealth of Copper objects
-
They supplied copper to the Harappans
V.K.Vinod
Names of places in Mesopotamian texts
Harappa |
Meluha |
Oman |
Magan |
Bahrain |
Dilmun |
Contact with distant lands
-
Harappans had trade relations with Mesopotamia, Oman, Bahrain
-
Evidences include Harappan seals, weights, dice and beads, depictions of ships and boats on seals.
-
Copper was also probably brought from Oman
-
A distinctive type of vessel, a large Harappan jar coated with a
thick layer of black clay has been found at Omani sites.
-
Harappans exchanged the contents of these vessels for Omani copper.
-
Mesopotamian texts datable to the third millennium BCE refer to copper coming from a region called Magan
-
The round “Persian Gulf” seal found in Bahrain sometimes carries Harappan motifs.
-
Mesopotamian texts mention the products from Meluhha: carnelian, lapis lazuli, copper, gold, and varieties of wood.
-
Contact with Oman, Bahrain or Mesopotamia was by sea.
Seals and sealing
-
Seals and sealing were used to facilitate long- distance communication.
-
Mouth of bag was tied on the knot was affixed some wet clay on which one or more seals were pressed
-
The sealing also conveyed the identity of the sender.
V.K.Vinod
Features of Harappan script
✔ Harappan script has not deciphered yet(An enigmatic script)
✔ Scripts are depicted on seals copper tools, rims of jars, copper and terracotta tablets, jewellery, bone rods, and an ancient signboard
V.K.Vinod
✔ Animal motif used in the objects for those who could not read.
✔ Script contains signs between 375 and 400.
✔ The longest script containing about 26 signs.
✔ Harappan script was pictographic not alphabetic
✔ Written from right to left
Weight
-
Exchanges were regulated by system of weights
-
Weights are made of a stone called chert
-
Shape generally cubical with no markings.
-
The lower denominations of weights were binary (1, 2, 4,8, 16, 32, etc. up to 12,800)
-
The higher denominations followed the decimal system.
Ancient Authority
• Some think there was a single ruler in Harappa
-
Some feel there was no single ruler but several rulers
-
Some archaeologists are of the opinion that Harappan society had no rulers
Why there was an authority or administration?(Indirect
evidences of administration)
-
● The similarity in artefacts
-
● Labour was mobilised for making bricks and for the construction
of massive walls and platforms.
-
● The evidence for planned settlements
-
● The standardised ratio of brick size
-
● The establishment of settlements near sources of raw material.
-
● A large building found at Mohenjodaro was labelled as a palace by archaeologists
-
● A stone statue from Mohenjodaro was labelled as the “priest- king”.
V.K.Vinod
Evidences for the End of Harappan civilisation/Late
Harappan cultures
-
By c. 1800 BCE most of the Mature Harappan sites abandoned.
-
Expansion of population into new settlements in Gujarat,
Haryana and western Uttar Pradesh.
-
Few Harappan sites after 1900 BCE shows the disappearance of the distinctive artefacts of the civilisation – weights, seals, special beads.
-
Writing, long-distance trade, and craft specialisation also disappeared.
-
House construction techniques deteriorated and large public structures were no longer produced.
-
Overall, artefacts and settlements indicate a rural way of life in what are called “Late Harappan” or “successor cultures”.
V.K.Vinod
Possible causes for the end of Harappan civilisation
1)Climatic change 2) Deforestation
V.K.Vinod
3) Excessive floods
4)Earth quakes
5) Epidemics
6)The shifting of rivers
7) The Drying up of rivers
8)Invasion of Aryans
Aryan invasion theory
-
R.E.M. Wheeler, then Director-General of the ASI believes Harappans were destroyed by Aryan invasion
-
There was an evidence of Massacre at Deadman Lane in Mohenjodaro
-
Indra, the Aryan war-god is called Puramdara, the fort-destroyer in Rigveda, the earliest known text in the subcontinent.
-
In the 1960s, the evidence of a massacre in Mohenjodaro was questioned by an archaeologist named George Dales
-
skulls found in Mohenjodaro do not belong same period
-
There were no evidences for war between Aryans and
Harappans(only 26 deadbodies found there)
-
Aryans reached in India around 1500 BCE
Sites, mounds, layers
Sites
• Archaeological sites are formed through the production, use and discarding of materials and structures.
Mounds
• When people continue to live in the same place, their constant use and reuse of the landscape results in the build up of occupational debris, called a mound.
Layers
-
Occupations are detected by traces of ancient materials found in layers, which differ from one another in colour, texture and the artefacts that are found in them.
-
Abandonment or desertions, what are called “sterile layers”, can be identified by the absence of much traces.
-
Generally, the lowest layers are the oldest and the highest are the most recent.
V.K.Vinod
• The study of these layers is called stratigraphy.
V.K.Vinod
-
Alexander Cunningham was the first Director-General of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI)
-
The father of Indian archaeology.
-
Cunningham’s main study was in the archaeology of the Early
Historic (6th century BCE -4th century. CE)
-
He used the accounts left by Chinese Buddhist pilgrims
Cunningham’s confusion
-
Harappan artefacts were found but Cunningham did not realise how old these were.
-
He unsuccessfully tried to place it within the time-frame with which he was familiar.
-
He thought that Indian history began with the first cities in the Ganga valley
Alexander Cunningham
Daya Ram Sahni discovered Harappan seals in the early decades of the twentieth century.
V.K.Vinod
Rakhal Das Banerji found seals at Mohenjodaro
-
John Marshall as Director-General of the A. S. I. marked a major change in Indian archaeology.
-
He was the first professional archaeologist to work in India
-
In 1924, John Marshall, announced the discovery of a new
civilisation in the Indus valley to the world.
-
S.N. Roy noted in The Story of Indian Archaeology, “Marshall left India three thousand years older than he had found her.” .
-
He had experience of working in Greece and Crete to the field.
-
He was keen to look for patterns of everyday life.
-
Marshall tended to excavate along regular horizontal units
-
He ignored the stratigraphy of the site.
.
-
All the artefacts recovered from the same unit were grouped together
• As a result, valuable information irretrievably lost
John Marshall
V.K.Vinod
-
R.E.Mortimer Wheeler became Director- General of the A.S.I. in 1944.
-
Wheeler recognised importance the stratigraphy of the mound rather than dig mechanically along uniform horizontal lines.
-
He brought with him a military precision to the practice of archaeology.
R.E.M. Wheeler REM
New techniques in Harappan archaeology
-
There has been growing international interest in Harappan archaeology since the 1980s
-
They are using modern scientific techniques including surface exploration to recover traces of clay, stone, metal and plant and animal remains as well as to minutely analyse every scrap of available evidence.
Problems of Piecing Together the Past
1. Harappan script does not help in understanding the ancient civilisation.
2. Organic materials such as cloth, leather, wood and reeds generally decompose, especially in tropical regions.
3. Only broken or useless objects would have been thrown away.
4. Valuable artefacts that are found intact were either lost in the past or hoarded and never retrieved.
Classifying finds
-
The first classification is in terms of material, such as stone,clay, metal, bone, ivory, etc.
-
The second, is in terms of function: archaeologists have to decide whether, an artefact is a tool or an ornament, or both, or something meant for ritual use.
-
Archaeologists also try to identify the function of an artefact by investigating the context in which it was found: was it found in a house, in a drain, in a grave, in a kiln?
-
Archaeologists have to take recourse to indirect evidence. For instance, though there are traces of cotton at some Harappan sites, to find out about clothing we have to depend on indirect evidence including depictions in sculpture.
V.K.Vinod
Harappan religion
V.K.Vinod
Evidences for religious belief
-
Mother goddesses(terracotta figurines of women, heavily jewelled, some with elaborate head-dresses)
-
Rare stone statuary of men like Priest-king (stone statuary of men in an almost standardised posture, seated with one hand on the knee)
-
The Great Bath(ritual bath)
-
The fire altars found at Kalibangan and Lothal.
-
Ritual scenes in the seals
-
Unicorn (the one-horned animal) depicted on seals
-
Plant motifs on seal(nature worship)
-
Proto-Shiva/pashupati (a figure shown in seal seated cross- legged in a “yogic” posture, surrounded by animals)
-
conical stone objects- linga worship
A Linga is a polished stone that is worshipped as a symbol of Shiva.
Linga
V.K.Vinod
Shamans
Shamans are men or women who claim magical and healing powers as well as ability to communicate with the other world
Problems of Interpretation; Proto shiva or yogi or
shaman?
-
The Rigveda (1500-1000 BCE ) mentions a god named Rudra, which is a name used for Shiva in later Puranic traditions
-
Shiva depicted as Pashupati
-
But Rudra in the Rigveda is neither depicted as Pashupati (lord
of animals in general and cattle in particular), nor as a yogi.
-
Is this, then, possibly a shaman as some scholars have suggested?
-
Are conical stone objects Lingas or gamesmen?
V.K.Vinod